In briefings to MPs, government
denies it panicked because of January troop movements
Defence Secretary
Shashi Kant Sharma has told Parliament that troop movements around New Delhi in mid-January
— movements which the government is reported to have been "spooked"
by — were in fact part of a “routine drill”.
In a testimony before
the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence, he also denied claims that the
troop movements were not authorised by the government. He said there were no
standard operating procedures in place for reporting exercises at the level of
army corps and below — and thus, no rules were violated.
Earlier this month, The
Indian Express reported that exercises by troops of the 50 Independent Para
Brigade and a Hisar-based mechanised infantry formation sparked “panic” in the
government. The movements took place, even as Chief of the Army Staff General
V.K. Singh moved the Supreme Court, seeking an emendation to his date of birth,
which would have given him several more months in office.
In an interview to The
Hindu, General Singh described claims that the Army was plotting a coup as
“fables of a sick mind.” The Army earlier said the movements were intended to
rehearse its preparedness to move special forces and tanks to airbases in heavy
fog.
Emerging facts
From background
briefings provided to individual members on the Standing Committee, some new
facts have begun to emerge on the events of January 15-16.
Late on the evening of
January 15, the MPs were told, a senior officer serving at the
Chandimandir-based Western Command notified the government of troop movements
around New Delhi .
The Western Command —responsible for the security along the India-Pakistan
border from Abohar-Fazilka to Jammu
— had learned of the troop movements from the Jaipur-based South-western
Command, which controls 50 Para and the Hisar-based formation.
“The officer,” said a
senior intelligence official who corroborated this account while speaking to The
Hindu, “said he was merely flagging the development for the government's
attention. He did not attribute motives.”
For days before this
notification, however, both the Intelligence Bureau and senior politicians had
worried that the fraught atmosphere created by General Singh's confrontation
might lead to indiscipline.
Intelligence Bureau
Director Nehchal Sandhu was, therefore, charged with investigating the
officer's claims. He sought counsel, among others, from Jammu and Kashmir
Governor N.N. Vohra, and India 's
most experienced defence bureaucrats, early on the morning of January 16. Key
military commanders were also contacted.
Intelligence Bureau
officials, however, denied claims that there was panic. “If someone called up
the police and said there was a suicide-bomber standing outside the Prime
Minister's house,” one officer said, “we'd have to take it seriously, even if
the chances were slim. You can hardly expect us to have been laid back about a
possible crime against the Constitution.”
Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh, the Standing Committee was told, was only informed of the
night's events at a routine morning meeting with National Security Adviser
Shivshankar Menon. Government sources insisted that this was not because the
troop movement was seen as a threat, but to prepare him for any question he
might face in Parliament.
Mr. Sharma himself
returned to New Delhi on the afternoon of
January 16 from a business visit to Malaysia . MPs have been told that
he rescheduled his journey on January 15 after learning that General Singh was
preparing to move the Supreme Court. He spent much of the day discussing legal
issues connected to the case, before meeting the Director-General of Military
Operations, Lieutenant-General Ashok Chaudhury, late that night.
The Defence Secretary,
the MPs were told, asked General Chaudhury to have the troops moved out once
their exercises were complete. However, two senior officials The Hindu spoke to
said the exercises were immediately terminated and the troops were ordered out
of their positions.
No comments:
Post a Comment