| http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=12341 | ||
| by Dr. A. Adityanjee | ||
History
In Making:
Francis
Fukuyama, that naïve American thinker in 1989 in his infamous essay predicted
the end of History and followed up the same thesis in his book in 1992. He was
so humbled by the geopolitical tsunamis that have followed in the last two
decades witnessing two major wars in the Persian gulf and the Af-Pak region;
break-up of Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, divorce of the Czech Republic and
Slovakia, toppling of some Arab Despots in South-West Asia; and emergence of new
nations like Eritrea, Kosovo, Macedonia, and South Sudan. History was, indeed,
made in 1947 when the Imperial British Government abdicated its legal
responsibility to control a murderous call for “direct action” and hurriedly
partitioned the Colonized India into the Republic of India and the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan.
 History would
be made indeed, in a sudden twist of fate, if the UK gets partitioned in 2014.
Following a referendum, an independent Scotland, in all probability, may
separate from the Westminster government charting its own future course within
the European Union (EU) as an independent nation. On May 25th 2012 Scottish
politicians, celebrities and activists in Edinburgh urged a million Scots to
sign a declaration of independence that would put “Scotland’s future “in
Scotland’s hands.”
The
Scottish Refrendum:
Now
it is certain that a referendum on the issue of independence will be held in
Scotland in 2014. Although Scottish public currently is 57% opposed to the idea
of Scottish independence, nationalism is very potent spirit that changes the
public opinion in a matter of days. The Scottish National Party (SNP) is in
power currently in Holyrood, Edinburgh and the Scottish First Minister (Chief
Minister), Alex Salmond is strongly spearheading the Scottish independence
campaign. He articulates cogently:
For
the next two and half years a sustained debate on divorce, harsh rhetoric
generated from both the sides and rekindled nationalistic fervor in Scotland may
eventually swamp the status quo.
The
mainstream UK politicians from the three large parties (Tories, Labor and
Liberal-democrats) have tried to scare the hell out of Scottish voters. They
would allow only two options in the referendum; keep the status quo or have
total independence in the 2014 referendum. Alex Salmond and the SNP have
demanded a third option of home rule also that would entail maximum devolution
of powers under the UK (so-called Devo Max, Devo plus or independence-lite
option).
In 2011, the UK treasury said the level of public spending per head in
Scotland was 1624 pounds higher than in England. The debt to the UK tax-payers
for bailing out the Royal Bank of Scotland was 26 billion pounds. Inherent is
the implicit threat that with total independence comes the fiscal
responsibility.
The
differences between the two sides are indeed very real and as Salmond
highlights:
“The
problem with Scotland’s current constitutional settlement is that we can not
innovate as much as we would like. Policy choices made in Westminster-by parties
whose democratic mandate in Scotland is negligible—are constraining policy
choices made in Scotland, for which there is an unequivocal
mandate.”
Scottish
Social Attitudes Survey done in 2009 found that 61 % of Scots trusted the
Scottish government to act in Scotland’s interest versus 25% who trusted the
British government.
Those
who argue that Scotland would be too small to go it alone forget that with a
population of 5.2 million, an independent Scotland would be comparable to other
European mini-states, e.g. Croatia 4.41 million, Denmark 5.5 million, Estonia
1.34 million, Finland 5.3 million, Macedonia 2.04 million, Norway 4.7 million,
Ireland 4.6 million, Kosovo 2.4 million, Latvia 2.24 million, Lithuania 3.26
million, Slovenia 2.03 million and Slovakia 5.5 million. It will certainly be
larger in population than tiny Montenegro with a population of less than one
million (626000).
Scotland would have anywhere from 81% to 90% control over the North Sea Oil and 8% share of UK’s assets and liabilities. UK’s national debt of 1.1 trillion pounds and the 8% share of Scotland (in proportion to Scottish population) would come to 88 billion pounds of debt independent Scotland will have to cope with. North Sea Oil has so far generated 250 billion pounds revenue for the UK central government.
Despite decline in yield 6% per
year, further pumping of crude would generate further 54 billion pounds in the
six years to 2016/17.
International
Significance:
Any
divorce and demise of the UK, as we currently know it, will have real
international geopolitical consequences. Mr. Salmond highlights the implications
when he states:
Perhaps,
the European Union would be over-eager to embrace an independent Scotland
because of highly ambivalent relationship with UK.
Following
the World War II, the UK, one of the major colonial powers, was forced to give
up its colonial possessions owing to changed geo-political circumstances and its
fiscal inability to project power internationally. With a deeply contracted
economy, a bankrupt Britain was unable to overextend its forces. It started
decolonization process reluctantly and slowly.
Liberation of Scotland from the
UK would be an ultimate exercise in decolonization since the time original
Scottish parliament (Estates of Scotland) was dissolved in 1707 under pressure
by the Act of Union 1707 to form a Parliament of the Great Britain.
Establishment of an Independent Scotland would unleash the genie of a chain
reaction leading ultimately to dissolution of the UK. After independence of
Ireland from the UK in 1922, Northern Ireland was retained as a province of the
UK. Independent Scotland will act as catalyst to spearhead the drive for
re-unification of the eight counties of the Northern Ireland with the rest of
Ireland and lead to a united republic of Ireland. In this context one recalls
the correspondence and contacts between the Irish freedom fighter Hugo de Valera
and MK Gandhi in the early part of the 20th century.
Both these wise men
appreciated the predicament of their respective countries and provided moral
support for the idea of total independence from Britain.
Since
the end of WWII, UK has had a disproportionate influence on international
affairs. Some of this was achieved by a Machiavellian “special relationship”
with the reigning super-power, US earning it the nick-name “America’s poodle”.
The fact that it was a former colonial power and continued to have a permanent
seat on the United Nations’ Security Council helped UK wield undue geo-political
influence that was not commensurate with its economic, mercantile and military
power or so-called comprehensive national power.
The fact that the UK chose to
exercise its soft power judiciously by using British Council scholarships for
academics and civil servants from the former colonies served British
geo-political interests very well. UK used its higher education system,
especially Cambridge and Oxford Universities to continue to impart its footprint
on the psyche of newly minted mandarins from the former colonies who liked to be
perceived as “British trained” or “UK returned”. UK cleverly continued to hang
on to the former colonial possessions by stitching them together in the glue of
the Commonwealth.
However, after the possible secession of Scotland in 2014 and
after the eventual dissolution of the UK, perhaps a tiny England may not be able
to hold on to its seat on P5 in the UNSC. This would also have bearing on the
remaining 14 British overseas territories (or colonies still under possession of
the UK), e.g. Falklands, Bermuda, Jersey Island, Montserrat, Cayman Island, Isle
of Man, British Virgin Islands, Gibraltar, Diego Garcia, St. Lucia etc. Will
Falkland be still under English control in 2015 is a question English policy
establishment needs to ponder over!
UK:
Rip
2014
may well be the watershed year that would lead to eventual independence of three
new European countries historically colonized by the Imperial England, namely
Scotland, Wales and the Duchy of Cornwall. If and when that happens, the United
Kingdom will be allowed to fade away into geo-political oblivion. Perhaps, at
that juncture, a diminished England may choose to republicanize the nation,
frame a new written constitution that it currently lacks, have a codified bill
of rights, abolish the hereditary House of the Lords, retire the anachronistic
Windsors (the English royal family) permanently and award them an annual “privy
purse” as compensation just like India did! Such a roadmap may ultimately lead
to a tiny England joining the USA as the 51st state just like Hawaii in order to
maintain that “special relationship”.
Geo-Political
Implications for India:
As
the former colonial power, the UK had immense influence on the history of India
that still has its impact. Partitioning India and consequent creation of a
congenitally antagonistic state of Pakistan was a clever, Machiavellian
geo-political ploy by the UK to have her strategic influence in the subcontinent
while playing footsie with Pakistan. UK has sided with Pakistan historically on
almost every issue of significance to India, starting with the accession of the
former princely state of the Jammu and Kashmir. UK continues to meddle in the
J& K affairs and inserts itself into every opportunity. UK was the
fountainhead of encouragement to the Khalistani separatist movement along with
US and Canada while being in bed with Pakistan on this issue. Khalistani
separatist leader Jagjeet Singh Chohan was based in London for years under the
benevolent patronage of the British Crown. Tamil separatists are traditionally
based in UK with their anti-Srilanka activities but also anti-India activities.
UK used the state visit of her Queen to humble India by demanding separate state
addresses by the British monarch in both Chennai Rajbhavan and Chandigarh
Rajbhavan besides a state address in Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi! This would
have been a very clear violation of the diplomatic protocol and India’s
sovereignty.
UK
still has thousands of stolen artifacts from India in its museums, art galleries
and private art collections. Unlike the Greeks who have made formal demand for
return of the Elgin marbles from London, the Government of India has not had the
courage to legally demand repatriation of plundered arts and archeological
treasures. Nor did Government of India hold the British Empire and its mandarins
responsible for genocide of Indians during the Great famine of Bengal in the
1940s. Unlike Israel which has pursued the former Nazis tenaciously wherever
they fled to; Government of India abdicated her national responsibility in
bringing the former colonial masters to justice. Perhaps, there will be window
of opportunity to get all the stolen treasures repatriated from English museums
after the dissolution of the UK. A thoroughly weakened and emasculated England
would not be able to justify continuing to hoard stolen Indian treasures and
cultural artifacts. Lastly, a fragmented England would not be able to play its
Pro-Pakistan game on the issue of J&K.
Engaging
Scotland:
India
must keenly watch the events leading to the Scottish referendum of 2014 and
engage the Scottish political elite in advance so that India as an emerging
super-power is not left out of policy options. India needs to use the principle
of reciprocity in international relations. India must not forget the lessons of
history. India has to resolve the outstanding issues left over from the history
with the UK or its successor state. India needs to be pro-active instead of
reactive in her policy formulations. India needs to shape the geopolitical
events by exercising her smart power. Here is a golden opportunity for India to
address and correct some of the injustices that were heaped on her in the past.
Unfortunately, India is going through a political and economic turmoil with national (parliamentary) elections scheduled for 2014. Another uncertain electoral outcome may plunge the country further deep into political as well as policy paralysis. Therefore, time is ripe now for the mandarins in the MEA to start formulating contingency plans, should an independent Scotland become a geopolitical reality in 2014. Starting with a Strategic Partnership Agreement, an extradition treaty and a Double Taxation Avoidance Treaty, the bilateral focus should be on tighter economic relationship with Scotland. North Sea oil could be imported from Scotland for the hydrocarbon needs of an energy starved India. The Tatas (who currently own the British luxury Jaguar Land Rover brand) should consider relocating their car production plants from England to up north in Scotland. The Mahindras should consider building their new SUV production plans in Scotland. Indian business houses should invest in newly independent Scotland when that reality emerges.
As
a nation formerly colonized by UK, almost all Indians would experience an
exhilarating feeling of schadenfreude at the independence of Scotland and
possible disintegration of the UK as we know it. India should act as a de
facto midwife in the birth of the new nation of independent Scotland. Just
like India gave her voice for the cause of decolonization of Africa, it must
provide moral, material and diplomatic support for the idea of Scottish
independence from the UK because it is the right thing to do.
Government of India should be the first country to formally recognize an independent Scotland as and when it formally secedes from the UK. Indian civil society needs to engage with the Scottish civil society in harboring a new geopolitical reality. The naysayers had predicted breakdown of India after the British left in 1947. Despite being a “functioning anarchy” and having a “Hindu Rate of Growth”, India survives while the UK faces imminent partition, fragmentation and demise of the union. The same Nattering Nabobs of Negativism have lampooned an independent Scotland to be a “Skintland” with capital “Edinborrow”. They will be proven wrong once again! Methinks that the juggernaut of independent Scotland is too strong to be stopped. Demise of the UK is just round the corner! | ||
14-Jun-2012
| ||
Sunday, 17 June 2012
Partitioning The UK?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment