March 29, 2012
China ’s total territory is
9.5967 million square kilometers, as compared to the US territory of 9.629091 million
square meters. A calculation based on the 1: 6.4438 middle rate between the US
dollar and the Chinese yuan that year, China
spent US$68.09 to protect each of its citizens on the average, while the US
average was US$2,201.5873.
Each year when China ’s top legislature and advisory body meet
in their annual sessions in Beijing , China ’s military spending will never be missed
by the Western media as a most reliable topic for stories peddling the theory
about China ’s
military threat. Moreover, any story on this topic will surely get a front-page
headline. How come that, one may ask. The answer is simple: Western journalists
look at China
with three ‘secret’ tools: amasthenic lens, magnifying glasses, and colored
spectacles.
These people know only too
well, of course, that most countries in the world have a military budget. They
love, however, to direct their amasthenic lens to China only. Let’s look
at the military budgets made public by some countries for the 2012-2013 fiscal
year. In terms of value, the US
military budget comes to as much as US$662 billion, while China ’s is just
around US$106 billion. In terms of growth rate, India
will spend 17 per cent more, while China will see a rise of merely
11.2 per cent. We really wonder why no one comes to point to the US or India as a military threat.
In the previous fiscal
year, China ’s
military spending stood at US$96.5 billion. In its appraisal report on China ’s military strength, however, the US put the
figure at US$160 billion. China
has never seen the annual growth of its military spending going above 18 per
cent in all these years except for 2009. Some Western think tanks have
groundlessly alleged, however, that China ’s military spending has kept
going up by more than 18.6% annually during the past decade.
The third ‘secret’ tool
valued by these Westerners is colored spectacles, for which they would rather
die than believe in any of China ’s
military spending figures, no matter how hard China tries to keep its military
budget transparent. China joined the UN Standardized Instrument
for Reporting Military Expenditures in as early as 2007, and has remained a
law-abiding member, as evidenced by its annual reporting of breakdown military
spending to the UN.
Also, it compiles its annual military budget compiled in line with its State
Budget Law and National Defense Law and submits it to the National People’s
Congress for review and approval, and report the execution of the previous
year’s military spending to the National People’s Congress for examination when
the Congress meets in its annual session in the first quarter of the following
year. Also, China
subjects its military spending to supervision by audit authorities, and
publishes a national defense white paper every two years to inform the
international community of the absolute and relative figures of its military
spending. Still, however, some people would keep looking at China with
colored spectacles. No effort by China to defend itself will come of
any avail. Submit or suffer under the label of a military threat. There is no
other alternative.
Who poses
the real threat, anyway? China
has never seized a single inch of another country or region’s territory. What it has seen, on the
contrary, is its reefs and isles being occupied and its resources being
plundered by others.
Isn’t it
justified to spend more on its military for the sake of keeping its territory
intact?
Has China ever
staged any military exercise off the coast of another country or carried out
any close reconnaissance of another country?
Isn’t it
justified to carry out military exercises on its own land or territorial
waters?
The
international community has been urging China to shoulder greater global
responsibilities and offer more public products. Can it fulfill all these
obligations without sufficient military spending?
As is known to all, China is a
country subject to a great variety of natural disasters. It needs money to deal
with emergencies and disasters and provide relief. Also, prices have kept
soaring in recent years. Shouldn’t the Chinese army be duly compensated for
the inflation? It has been a hard fact that every coin the Chinese army
gets is meant for maintenance of peace and prevention of war. What’s wrong with
China
to add a new weight to the scale of peace by increasing its military
spending?
Some have alleged that China ’s
military budget has outgrown its demand for self-defense. Well, let’s look at
some figures provided by a military scholar.
According to its 6th Census , China
had a population of 1.37 billion (excluding Taiwan ’s population) by November 1,
2010. The US
population, meanwhile, stood at 315 million by 7 o’clock of October 17, 2011,
EST.
As for their spending
earmarked to protect each square kilometer of land, the Chinese figure stood at
US$9.720.3671, while the US
figures came to US$75,292.673. The big gap tells where real threats will
ferment.
To speak the truth, there
are only a handle of countries trumpeting the theory about China ’s
military threat. There is something common between these countries: without
crying wolf or naming an imaginary enemy, they will lose the engine driving
their development and feel uncomfortable. As a solution, they would look
around for find a ‘foe’ or imagine some source of threats. It is precisely
against such a backdrop that China
has fallen into their prey.
For all the explanations
and reasoning by China ,
these countries simply would not be convinced. Instead, they have chosen to
start a wave to foul China ’s
reputation. Go as they wish, then. China will keep to its own path.
Strengthening of its national defense is the established duty of a sovereign
country, and does not need to be tailored to the likes or dislikes of any other
country. Mountains thrust skyward and rivers flow eastward. You can never
change that, can you?
Major General Luo Yuan is Member of the Chinese
People’s Political Consultative Conference, Executive Director and Deputy
Secretary General of the Chinese Society of Military Science.
No comments:
Post a Comment