Mar. 16, 2012 - 05:16PM
The U.S. Navy expects cost growth on
its largest shipbuilding project to continue, and will need to ask Congress next
year for permission to pay the higher-than-planned-for bills.
“Will the Navy be asking for
legislative relief from the cost cap of $600 billion?” Sen. John McCain,
R-Ariz., asked March 15 during a Navy budget hearing.
“Not this year, but
I’m certain we will be asking next year,” replied Navy Secretary Ray Mabus.
Congress in 2008 capped the
acquisition cost of the new nuclear aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) at
$11.76 billion. The Government Accountability Office, however, has warned that
— if uncontrolled — cost growth on the project could reach as much as $1
billion by 2015.
The admission by
Mabus comes despite repeated assertions by the Navy and shipbuilder
Huntington-Ingalls Industries (HII) that they are working to restrain the price
rise on the ship, being built to the first new carrier design since the 1960s.
“This is the lead
ship of the class,” Mabus told McCain. “You and I have discussed how much new
technology was put on this previously, and how the risk went up, and how the
downside of that risk came true.”
Speaking to
reporters after his appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee,
Mabus reiterated the challenges involved in keeping the ship within its budget.
“In the late ’90s,
they were going to put new technology on three successive carriers,” he said.
“In 2002, the defense secretary [Donald Rumsfeld] made the decision no, we’re
going to put it on one, 78. That sent the risk sky high.
“That contract was supposed to be
signed for that ship in 2006; it didn’t get signed until 2008,” Mabus said.
“When the contract was signed, the ship was about 30 percent designed. That is
no way to build a ship. There is no surprise that the cost has gone up.”
The Ford is
designed with a host of new features, Mabus said.
“This is a brand
new ship. It’s a new hull, it’s a new island, a new [aircraft] launch system, a
new recovery system, a new electrical system, a new propulsion system. When you
try to smush all that together in one ship, you raise the risk. And the
downside of risk is cost growth.
“I think they
attempted way too much on one major platform,” he added.
Mabus pledged that
the situation will not be repeated on the next carrier, the John F. Kennedy
(CVN 79).
“The one thing that we are absolutely
committed to and the one thing that we will not go forward with on CVN 79 is
that we will take the lessons learned here,” he told McCain. “We will have a
firm price, and we will not come back to the Senate or Congress to ask for
raising the cost cap on the John F. Kennedy, CVN-79.”
No comments:
Post a Comment