http://www.dawn.com/2012/03/16/indias-claim-of-support-for-unsc-seat-belied.html
UNITED NATIONS, March 15: Despite
India’s two-year efforts to secure a permanent seat in the powerful UN Security
Council alongwith Brazil, Germany and Japan most UN members remain unconvinced
by the rationale given by the so-called G-4 countries.
Many UN delegates say
G-4 countries seeking expansion of both permanent and non-permanent categories
of membership have even failed to prove their last year’s claim of having
enlisted the support of 80 countries — a figure below the majority required for
any proposal to succeed in the 193-member General Assembly.
Pakistan
and Italy representing the Uniting for Consensus group (UFC) have maintained
that expansion in the UN Security Council should be in the non-permanent
category in order to allow all countries, including small and under-developed,
to become part of the process. They want an inclusive strategy which is
transparent and accountable. They have sought a consensus on the issue.
Pakistan’s
delegate Raza Bashir Tarar has, in his statement, stressed the need for
‘compromise and flexibility’ among competing groups to move the reform process
forward.
He asked if the
India-led group wished to add 4 to 6 new permanent members, how a workable
ratio between permanent and non-permanent members could be maintained
especially if the council’s size was to be restricted to about 25? There was no
response from the group’s leaders.
A
number of questions about the group’s position on other issues, especially veto
power, also remained unanswered. Pakistan and Italy lead the Uniting for
Consensus (UfC) group and oppose any addition to the Council’s permanent
members, but seek enlargement of the non-permanent category, with longer terms.
Despite
a general agreement on enlarging the council, as part of the UN reform process,
member states remain sharply divided over details, most of them sticking to
their positions.
Mr
Tarar, who is the deputy permanent representative of Pakistan to the UN, said
the India-backed initiative “squeezes the space for non-permanent members and
compromises the notion of accountability and democratisation of the Security
Council”.
No comments:
Post a Comment